Discuție:Artur Balder

Articolul Artur Balder trebuie să respecte îndrumările referitoare la biografiile personalităților în viață. Afirmațiile problematice și cele negative, în special cele calomnioase, introduse fără bibliografie sau cu o bibliografie insuficientă trebuie înlăturate pe loc. Regula celor trei reveniri nu se aplică în astfel de înlăturări de text. Inserarea repetată a unor astfel de afirmații se va raporta la pagina de reclamații.

Pagina Artur Balder a fost propusă anterior pentru ștergere, dar discuția a dus la păstrarea ei. Puteți consulta discuția respectivă pentru eventualele comentarii relevante.

The deletion of many of the articles about this person was part of a campaign leaded by a Norwegian wikipedist. References are clear now globally throughout WP. --Lolox76 (discuție) 7 iulie 2011 23:29 (EEST)

A Dutch user, http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:MoiraMoira, is aabusing with vandalism all the trasnlations of the subject Artur Balder.

In some wp, her actions have been deleted after review of local administrators. http://eo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Artur_Balder&action=history

Those are the facts:

The article Artur Balder was voted to be kept at the English wp after review of the references http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artur_Balder

After that, some translation of this article, well done by native in other wp, were uploaded. She is still deleting them under the excuse: "cross wp spam", and indeed they are translation of an accepted wp well referenced article.

Im looking for penalties at the local wp because of pure vandalism done by http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:MoiraMoira

--Lolox76 (discuție) 27 iulie 2011 02:05 (EEST)

Antisemitism from sysop MoiraMoira and its attacks against Balder

Harassment is too when, for example, an editor deletes an article without consensus in other wikis. Thats what happened there, and you know were. The attacks of Dutch user MoiraMoira can be considered cross wp vandalism. This user is the one who did not keep the discussion at the Dutch wp, instead of that, the user destroyed well translated articles, that were approved long time before the English one, without local consensus at several wikipedias. As a result, the article is back in most of them, by local wp editors, not by me. The discussion cannot be kept in one wiki, because the attacks were cross wp by the mentioned user. International court is needed to investigate the facts. On top of that, there you have solved the question of the image at commons. And one thing more: the author is translated into Dutch. Thats enough, with the international references, to guarantee notability and keep a sketch of the English one at the Dutch wikipedia, as I provided it. The cross wp vandalism against the article, supported by collaborators of MoiraMoira, should be investigated.

--Lolox76 (talk) 02:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

One thing more: it is too far when, at some wikipedias, and now there are several cases at the Dutch one, this kind of agressive reactions from editors, blocking certain persons and names, come out specially when the subjects are of openly of jewish origin, as is the case of Artur Balder. I dont want to use, not yet, the word, but there is a certain degree of antisemitism in the cross wp vandalism prepetrated by MoiraMoira against Artur Balder, and the blocking of the name at the Dutch wikipedia.--Lolox76 (talk) 02:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Image problem has been solved. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Artur_Balder_Directs.jpg --Lolox76 (talk) 21:28, 1 August 2011 (UTC)